The Environmental Movement and Climate Change
Since the 1980s, the environmental movement in the United States has expanded to address not only pollution and conservation but also the growing threat of climate change. During this time, environmental disasters, global agreements, and political debates have shaped both public awareness and federal policy. While efforts to protect the environment have gained some momentum, deep political divides have slowed action on climate change at many levels of government.
Expanding the Movement: From Pollution to Climate
In the early decades of the modern environmental movement, efforts focused mainly on pollution control, conservation, and protecting public health. But by the 1980s, scientists were warning that human activities—especially the burning of fossil fuels—were increasing greenhouse gases and raising global temperatures. These warnings led environmental groups to push for action on climate change, a term that refers to long-term changes in Earth’s climate caused by natural and human factors.
This shift meant the movement was no longer just about protecting natural spaces or preventing oil spills. It was also about the energy economy, international cooperation, and the role of science in shaping public policy.
Oil Spills and Environmental Disasters
Several major environmental disasters brought national attention to the consequences of industrial accidents and weak environmental protections. In 1989, the Exxon Valdez oil spill released over 11 million gallons of crude oil into Alaska’s Prince William Sound. It damaged ecosystems, harmed wildlife, and raised questions about corporate responsibility and government preparedness.
In 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil spill became one of the worst in U.S. history. An explosion on a drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico killed 11 workers and released millions of barrels of oil into the ocean over nearly three months. The disaster exposed gaps in safety enforcement and triggered demands for stricter offshore drilling regulations.
These events influenced policy by prompting both immediate emergency responses and longer-term debates about the balance between environmental protection and energy development.
Hurricane Katrina and Environmental Justice
In 2005, Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast, leading to over 1,800 deaths and massive destruction in New Orleans and surrounding areas. The storm revealed serious weaknesses in infrastructure, emergency response, and environmental planning. Many of the hardest-hit communities were low-income and majority-Black neighborhoods located in flood-prone areas.
This event helped raise awareness of the Environmental Justice Movement, which argues that environmental risks and disasters often affect marginalized communities more severely. Advocates have since worked to ensure that environmental policies address racial and economic inequality, especially in decisions about land use, pollution, and disaster response.
The Climate Debate and International Agreements
By the 1990s and early 2000s, climate change had become a central issue in global politics. In 1997, the United States helped negotiate the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, political opposition at home led the U.S. Senate to reject the treaty, arguing it would hurt the economy and did not require equal commitments from developing countries.
This debate revealed the political challenges of addressing climate change. Some lawmakers and industries questioned the science behind climate change or argued that strong environmental rules would damage jobs and energy production. Others pushed for aggressive action, warning of long-term consequences if emissions were not reduced.
Over time, these divisions led to a pattern of inconsistent policy. Some presidents prioritized clean energy and international cooperation, while others rolled back environmental regulations or withdrew from global climate agreements.
Recent Developments and Ongoing Debates
In recent years, wildfires, floods, and extreme weather events have increased concerns about the impacts of climate change. Many Americans now view climate change as a serious issue, but political disagreements remain over how best to respond.
At the federal level, some policies have supported clean energy, reduced emissions, or rejoined international agreements. Others have focused on protecting fossil fuel industries or limiting the role of environmental agencies. Meanwhile, many state and local governments have created their own climate policies in areas like transportation, building codes, and renewable energy.
The debate continues to reflect broader disagreements over science, economics, and government power. While the environmental movement has succeeded in bringing attention to climate change, turning that attention into lasting and unified policy has proven difficult.